Yichen Guo

Yichen Guo

AI Research

Nanyang Technological University

Seeking PhD · Spring / Fall 2027

← Back to Selected Work

arXiv 2026 · Preprint

MiCo

Mutual Information Coverage Optimization through Semantic Erasure Modeling for Efficient MLLM Inference

Tinghao Wang, Yichen Guo, Qizhe Zhang, Yuan Zhang, Weimin Ouyang, Rui Huang, Jiajun Cao, Sixiang Chen, Hao Jiang, Jixian Wu, Zheng Lu, Bofan Zhu, Renyuan Li, Shanghang Zhang

Yichen Guo · Co-first author

A project overview on Yichen Guo's research homepage, based on the linked paper.

Overview

MiCo reduces the cost of multimodal language model inference without additional training. Through a semantic erasure model, it derives a mutual information coverage objective from task log-loss. Rather than ranking visual tokens independently, it selects a subset that covers useful visual information: first from visual features, then with task-aware signals inside the language model.

MiCo's two-stage inference pipeline, stage-specific information and attention signals, and greedy mutual information coverage selection.
The two-stage pruning framework and coverage selector, reproduced from Figure 2 of the paper (arXiv v2). Full text and figures

How it works

  1. Build a representative visual candidate pool

    Before the language model, Stage 1 combines visual feature norms with vision-encoder CLS attention. It retains a larger candidate pool to preserve visual coverage before the tokens interact with the question.

  2. Refine the subset using the task

    At a selected decoder layer, Stage 2 combines contextualized feature norms with text-to-visual attention. It selects a smaller subset that covers information relevant to the current question.

  3. Optimize weighted coverage greedily

    Both stages use nonnegative cosine similarity to measure how well retained tokens represent the source positions. Tokens are added by their marginal weighted coverage gain until the budget is reached. The observable coverage objective is monotone and submodular, giving greedy selection a 1 − 1/e approximation under a cardinality constraint.

Evaluation

The paper evaluates eight image models and one video model across visual reasoning, OCR, grounding, hallucination detection, and long-video understanding. On LLaVA-NeXT-13B, it reports retaining 97.5% of average baseline performance with 5.6% of visual tokens and about 3.8× one-token inference speedup. The NeXT timing protocol uses one A800 80GB GPU, batch size one, and excludes loading, preprocessing, and host-to-device transfer. On LLaVA-Video-7B at 16 tokens per frame, MiCo retains 93.0% of average baseline performance with a 2.31× complete-answer speedup. Full benchmark results, ablations, and limitations are in the paper.

Performance versus speedup and latency-component breakdowns for MiCo on LLaVA-NeXT-7B and LLaVA-Video-7B.
Performance–efficiency trade-offs and latency breakdowns, reproduced from Figure 3 (arXiv v2). NeXT uses one-token latency; Video uses complete-answer latency. Full text and figures

Paper and resources

MiCo: Mutual Information Coverage Optimization through Semantic Erasure Modeling for Efficient MLLM Inference
arXiv:2609.34330

Figures and technical descriptions are based on the linked paper. The original author list and publication status are shown above.

Powered by Jekyll and the Minimal Light theme.

Research figure

Scroll to inspect the full figure. Press Escape to close.